Would You Swim Here?
What routine beach testing does—and does not—tell us about Banfield Park, the Gorge Waterway and Victoria Harbour
By John Roe, Veins of Life Watershed Society
On a warm summer afternoon, Banfield Park Dock looks like exactly what the City of Victoria says it is: a place to swim, paddle, sit in the sun and enjoy the Gorge Waterway.
The dock was substantially expanded in 2024. The City promotes it as a popular summer destination and a public access point for swimming and paddling. Families arrive with towels. Children jump from the edge. Paddleboards and kayaks move through the water. Houses and trees line the opposite shore.
It is a beautiful picture.
But a new dock does not create new water.
The water beneath Banfield Dock is the same tidal water connected to Selkirk Waters, Cecelia Creek, Rock Bay, the Upper Harbour and Victoria’s Inner Harbour. It moves past municipal storm drains, old industrial shorelines, contaminated sediment and places where sewage-related pollution has been documented for decades.
That history did not disappear when the ribbon was cut.
The public question is not whether the dock is attractive. It is not whether swimming in the Gorge should be encouraged as a long-term goal.
The question is much simpler:
What does routine beach testing actually tell a swimmer—and what part of the story is left out?
I am not against swimming in the Gorge